Across the country, college campuses are intensifying disciplinary actions against fraternities and sororities, citing a wave of incidents related to hazing, alcohol abuse, and discrimination. In response to heightened public scrutiny and increasing legal liability, universities are shutting down chapters, revoking recognition, and initiating sweeping investigations—sometimes without giving the student organizations a fair chance to defend themselves.

What began as a series of high-profile tragedies has evolved into a broader campaign of institutional accountability, but the legal process surrounding many of these crackdowns remains murky. Greek organizations argue that they are being penalized based on assumptions, group reputations, or the misconduct of a few individuals—often without clear evidence or due process protections.

Joseph Lento, founder of Lento Law Firm and a legal advocate for student rights, has represented numerous Greek life organizations and individual members in university investigations.

Lento comments, “Universities cannot legally presume guilt based on group affiliation or unverified allegations. We’ve defended Greek organizations where investigations lacked specificity and violated basic due process. If your chapter is being investigated, demand written charges and access to all evidence immediately.”

One of the central legal challenges is how schools apply their codes of conduct to entire student groups. In many cases, disciplinary charges are brought against entire chapters based on anonymous complaints or general allegations, without identifying individual members or providing specific factual evidence. The result: entire organizations suspended or dissolved based on incidents they may not have known about or condoned.

Many universities have also begun using interim suspensions and administrative holds as a way to act swiftly without completing formal investigations. These preemptive measures—often imposed before students are given a chance to respond—can block students from registering for classes, participating in activities, or graduating. In group cases, this can leave dozens of students in limbo based on the actions of a few.

Lento adds, “Interim suspensions should only be imposed with cause and follow-up hearings. Legal counsel can request immediate reviews of such measures, particularly if no opportunity to respond was given. We have successfully petitioned to lift suspensions that were imposed prematurely or unfairly.”

These crackdowns often occur in the context of hazing investigations, which schools are under increasing pressure to pursue aggressively. But the definition of hazing varies widely across institutions, and enforcement can be inconsistent. In some cases, harmless rituals or social gatherings are labeled as violations simply because they fall within the university’s broad definitions of coercion or misconduct.

Moreover, the reputational damage tied to these investigations can be permanent. Once a chapter is accused of hazing or discrimination, the public narrative often assumes guilt—even if the group is later exonerated. University press releases, media coverage, and campus rumors can follow students long after graduation, making it difficult to repair the damage.

Lento mentions, “Legal action is possible when reputational damage stems from false or unsupported claims. We encourage affected organizations to collect all communications, document procedural violations, and challenge any official statements that misrepresent facts. With legal intervention, you can push back against institutional overreach.”

In high-profile cases, national Greek organizations have pushed back by filing lawsuits against universities, alleging defamation, breach of contract, and denial of due process. Courts have begun taking a closer look at how institutions handle these group proceedings, especially when they fail to follow their own disciplinary rules.

Ultimately, while efforts to improve safety and accountability in Greek life are important, they must be balanced with fairness and adherence to procedure. Student organizations deserve the same rights and protections as individual students, especially when facing accusations that carry severe academic and social consequences. 

Disclaimer and Disclosure:

This article is an opinion piece for informational purposes only. Flaunt and its affiliates do not take responsibility for the views expressed. Readers should conduct independent research to form their own opinions.

‍